Is wikipedia good смотреть последние обновления за сегодня на .
We've all been told that Wikipedia isn't a good source for research, but how can it have such high quality information and yet still be susceptible to user vandalism? Naturally, the answer involves robots. Whoopsy by Audionautix is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (🤍 Artist: 🤍
Wikipedia is making us all dumb and lazy. SUBSCRIBE: 🤍 FOLLOW ME: 🇨🇦Support me on Patreon! 🤍 🤖Join my Discord! 🤍 🇺🇸Follow me on Instagram! 🤍 🇨🇦Read my latest Washington Post columns: 🤍 🇨🇦Visit my Canada Website 🤍 Some music by: Craig Henderson- 🤍 ComradeF- 🤍 HASHTAGS: #wikipedia #rant #videoessay
It's the go-to website for information on just about anything. But is the info on Wikipedia worth it's weight in megabytes? Trace has the answer and tells us about a new plan to up the accuracy of some of its most popular pages. Read More: UCSF First U.S. Medical School to Offer Credit For Wikipedia Articles 🤍 "UC San Francisco soon will be the first U.S. medical school at which medical students can earn academic credit for editing medical content on Wikipedia." Medical Students Can Now Earn Credit for Editing Wikipedia 🤍 "Starting this winter, medical students at the University of California San Francisco will be able to obtain academic credit from an unlikely source: Wikipedia." Using Wikipedia 🤍 "As a tool for scholarly research, Wikipedia can be either a grade-killer or a valuable friend, depending on who you ask and what you hope to accomplish using it. What is fairly certain is that your professor won't let you cite it in a scholarly research paper." Citing Wikipedia 🤍 Most university lecturers discourage students from citing any encyclopedia in academic work, preferring primary sources; some specifically prohibit Wikipedia citations. Wales stresses that encyclopedias of any type are not usually appropriate to use as citeable sources, and should not be relied upon as authoritative." Special Report Internet encyclopaedias go head to head 🤍 "Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds." Britannica attacks... and we respond. 🤍 Watch More: Are We All Internet Addicts? 🤍 Scientists Vs Internet Trolls 🤍 7 NEW Wonders Of the World: 🤍 DNews is dedicated to satisfying your curiosity and to bringing you mind-bending stories & perspectives you won't find anywhere else! New videos twice daily. Watch More DNews on TestTube 🤍 Subscribe now! 🤍 DNews on Twitter 🤍 Anthony Carboni on Twitter 🤍 Laci Green on Twitter 🤍 Trace Dominguez on Twitter 🤍 DNews on Facebook 🤍 DNews on Google+ 🤍 Discovery News 🤍
Free Civic Online Reasoning lessons, assessments and videos are available at 🤍 You might have heard that you can’t trust anything on Wikipedia. If that’s the case, then why do professional fact checkers often use it? In this video, we break down the basics of how to use Wikipedia wisely. Based on research with professional fact checkers, the Civic Online Reasoning curriculum from the Stanford History Education Group provides resources to help students become better consumers of digital information.
I love Wikipedia! I even donated to it. But I won't donate again, now that I've learned how BIASED Wikipedia has become. ———— To make sure you see the new weekly video from Stossel TV, sign up here: 🤍 ———— No right-leaning outlets, Fox News Politics, the Daily Wire, the Daily Caller, etc… is considered “reliable” by Wikipedia. None. But even some of the most extreme leftist outlets get a "reliable" badge like “Jacobin," a self-described SOCIALIST outlet. Vox, Buzzfeed News, and Slate are also deemed “reliable” by Wikipedia. Editors may base stories on their reporting. Why did Wikipedia become so biased? Veteran Wikipedian Jonathan Weiss tells me that the site, like academia, has been captured by leftists. Some Wikipedia administrators even brag on their profiles, "this user is a socialist." Another put up images idolizing communist murderers Che Guevara and Vladimir Lenin. These administrators make final decisions about what counts as “reliable," and what goes on Wikipedia. That’s why for years, Wiki's "communism" page made NO mention of the millions killed by that ideology. US border facilities are listed under "concentration camps,” on the same page as Wikipedia’s holocaust facilities. Can we fix this? Wikipedia is supposed to be a site that "anyone can edit," so I made an edit. You can find out what happened in the video above.
Wikipedia is good resource... or is it? Vaush answers this age-old question. Disclaimer: This channel is run by a fan and is not affiliated with Vaush source: 🤍 #vaush #clip ✨✨
OMG A PETERNITY UPLOAD yeah sorry about the lack of uploads, my brain exploded sadly and i was out of ideas and motivation for a little while. i SHOULD be back now though Second Channel: 🤍 Discord: 🤍 Twitter: 🤍 Instagram: 🤍
Let's talk about Wikipedia. Wikipedia is often maligned by teachers and twitter trolls alike as an unreliable source. And yes, it does sometimes have major errors and omissions, but Wikipedia is also the Internet's largest general reference work and as such an incredibly powerful tool. Today we'll discuss using Wikipedia for good - to help us get a birds-eye view of content, better evaluate information with lateral reading, and find trustworthy primary sources. Special thanks to our partners from MediaWise who helped create this series: The Poynter Institute The Stanford History Education Group (sheg.stanford.edu) Follow MediaWise and their fact-checking work across social: 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 MediaWise is supported by Google. Crash Course is on Patreon! You can support us directly by signing up at 🤍 Thanks to the following Patrons for their generous monthly contributions that help keep Crash Course free for everyone forever: Eric Prestemon, Sam Buck, Mark Brouwer, Naman Goel, Patrick Wiener II, Nathan Catchings, Efrain R. Pedroza, Brandon Westmoreland, dorsey, Indika Siriwardena, James Hughes, Kenneth F Penttinen, Trevin Beattie, Satya Ridhima Parvathaneni, Erika & Alexa Saur, Glenn Elliott, Justin Zingsheim, Jessica Wode, Kathrin Benoit, Tom Trval, Jason Saslow, Nathan Taylor, Brian Thomas Gossett, Khaled El Shalakany, SR Foxley, Yasenia Cruz, Eric Koslow, Caleb Weeks, Tim Curwick, D.A. Noe, Shawn Arnold, Malcolm Callis, Advait Shinde, William McGraw, Andrei Krishkevich, Rachel Bright, Jirat, Ian Dundore Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet? Facebook - 🤍 Twitter - 🤍 Tumblr - 🤍 Support Crash Course on Patreon: 🤍 CC Kids: 🤍
Wikipedia has a page on just about everything — but can it be used as a reliable source? Teen Fact-Checker Pride explains the different ways you can make sure a Wikipedia article is legit, along with tips on how you can make sure you're using the website responsibly. ATTENTION TEACHERS: This fact-check is featured in a free, one-hour lesson plan. The lesson is available through PBS LearningMedia, and includes lesson summary and a handout, among other resources. Go to: 🤍 - Learn more about MediaWise: 🤍 Follow MediaWise on Instagram: 🤍 Follow MediaWise on Facebook: 🤍 Follow MediaWise on Twitter: 🤍 Follow MediaWise on TikTok: 🤍
This video talks about how the world's largest encyclopedia came to be and how it operates differently than most other popular websites. To submit ideas and vote on future topics: 🤍 Patreon: 🤍 Twitter: 🤍 A very special thanks to this wonderful group of Patrons: Amy Westacott, Angus Clydesdale, Brandon L, Brett Walton, Chris Lion-Transler, Christian & Penny Gray, Dominique Dugas, Dustin Van Horn, Dylan Kinnard, Emerald Computers – Jason Dragon, Fortunate Calf, Jesse Long, Jimmy1985, Jon, Julianne Beach, Logan Brown, Marshall Kurtz, Meow Wolf, Michelle Chisholm, Mike Weaver, milkshake, My NameIsKir, Nicholas Murphy, Peter Wesselius, Rob, Robert T Kirton, Sam Bennett, Sirpoptart, Sondre Grimsmo Sinnes, Stewart Tritapoe, Super Duper Paratrooper, Taylor LaBrier, Tristan Williams, Victor Anne, Vincent Frame. Company Declines: Kmart: 🤍 Blockbuster: 🤍 RadioShack: 🤍 Solo Cups: 🤍 Toys "R" Us: 🤍 hhgregg: 🤍 Pan Am: 🤍 ESPN: 🤍 Gibson: 🤍 iHeartMedia: 🤍 Bon-Ton: 🤍 Kodak: 🤍 General Electric: 🤍 Woolworth: 🤍 Dell: 🤍 Sears: 🤍 Payless: 🤍 Hostess: 🤍 Redbox: 🤍 Nokia: 🤍 JCPenney: 🤍 Quiznos: 🤍 GameStop: 🤍 NASCAR: 🤍 Shopko: 🤍 MoviePass: 🤍 Reebok: 🤍 The Gap: 🤍 Pier 1 Imports: 🤍 Sbarro: 🤍 AOL: 🤍 Long John Silver's: 🤍 Chuck E. Cheese's: 🤍 GNC: 🤍 Website created by - 🤍 Intro Made By - 🤍
Why Wikipedia Works Really Well in Practice, Just Not in Theory Watch the newest video from Big Think: 🤍 Join Big Think Edge for exclusive videos: 🤍 Harvard University's Jonathan Zittrain explores the amazing success of Wikipedia, a concept that "works really well in practice, just not in theory." Not only is it a remarkable and unique model of a self-regulating entity, but also its governors and stakeholders are both members of the public at large. Zittrain examines whether Wikipedia is something that can be sustained long-term, whether it will need to adapt or grow in the future, and whether such adaptations and growth could potentially scuttle the entire operation. Finally, Zittrain offers up a suggestion for how to apply Wikipedia in an academic setting: Why not turn Wikipedia articles into long-term research projects? JONATHAN ZITTRAIN: Jonathan Zittrain is a Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, Professor of Computer Science at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vice Dean for Library and Information Resources for the Harvard Law School Library, and Co-Founder of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society. Previously, he was the Chair in Internet Governance and Regulation at Oxford University and a principal of the Oxford Internet Institute. He was also a visiting professor at the New York University School of Law and Stanford Law School. Zittrain’s research interests include battles for control of digital property and content, cryptography, electronic privacy, the roles of intermediaries within Internet architecture, and the useful and unobtrusive deployment of technology in education. He is also the author of The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It, as well as co-editor of the books, Access Denied (MIT Press, 2008), Access Controlled (MIT Press, 2010), and Access Contested (MIT Press, 2011). TRANSCRIPT: Jonathan Zittrain: There's a great saying that Wikipedia works really well in practice, just not in theory. And that is true. Wikipedia's success is so singular, so spectacular that figuring out whether it's a model for anything other than Wikipedia is a puzzle that even the folks behind Wikipedia have faced as they've tried to do Wikisearch, Wikinews, and Wiktionary at different times. But the idea of having a scheme where the day-to-day governance, the day-to-day edits, whether done for substance to improve the truth level of an article in the view of the editor or done for process, oh that edit shouldn't have been made; it breaks the following rule; I'm going to revert it. To have the people doing that be members of the public at large is an extraordinary devolution of responsibility out to people who are in one way or another, implicitly or explicitly sort of taking an oath to subscribe to the principles behind Wikipedia of neutrality, of fairness, of learning — kind of the values of the enlightenment. And can that survive itself over the long haul? I don't know. As you get more and more importance attached to Wikipedia, more and more places that draw from Wikipedia as a source of data, whether it's something like the Wolfram Alpha Knowledge engine or Google to assemble basic facts for results in a search. There may be more and more reason for entities to want to game the results. If you can just put yourself in the Guinness Book of World Records for having the longest beard or something and you don't actually have to grow anything, it's like well why not? I'll vote myself rich. These are problems that Wikipedia has had to deal with so far relatively successfully. And there's a level of humility that I think it has to maintain in order to recognize new problems, to recognize where there might the structural forms of bias or discrimination going on. And to be able to endure the more targeted intentional attempts to basically poison the well of truth that Wikipedia at least aspires to be. What would I propose as a longer-term way of shoring it up? I think we should solve a problem with a problem. We haven't really figured out in the early 21st century what to do with kids who are in school for hours at a time every day sort of warehoused in daycare; I think it would be wonderful to make as part of the curriculum from, say,... To read the transcript, please go to 🤍
Wikipedia is big cringe. There are systematic reasons why it is the way it is, but I mean also some articles just make you think they must've been written by furries or something... I don't use it at all anymore, removed it from my bookmarks and don't plan on using it ever again. DONATE NOW: 🤍 💰😎👌💯 WEBSITE: 🤍 🌐❓🔎 Here's the boomer blogpost I mentioned by Larry Sanger co-founder and long-time critic of Wikipedia: 🤍
Guys, if you wanna learn how to make videos, i have officially opened up the Nas Academy! It's an ONLINE school where we teach you how to script, shoot ,and edit videos...LIVE! Nas Academy has very limited spots, so sign up now - That's 1 minute, see you tomorrow. 🤍
A quick look at what makes Wikipedia work and what made it one of the most visited sites on the internet. MERCH: 🤍 PATREON: 🤍 REDDIT: 🤍 TWITTER: 🤍 DISCORD: 🤍 Download Wikipedia: 🤍 Sources: 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 Music: "Omission" by Huma-Huma "Talkies" by Huma-Huma "Pas de Deux" by Bird Creek "Nighttime Stroll" by E's Jammy Jams #Wikipedia #Encyclopedia #Internet #Knowledge
An apalling example of of how nitpickers "improve" science articles. Follow also my backup channel at 🤍
Wikipedia contributes the knowledge of the world and also helps to make knowledge more easily accessible. This can be seen as a good thing in the service of humanity. However, not everything is so good. In this video, we take a look at the other side of Wikipedia. What is your opinion about Wikipedia? Tell us in the comments... ▸ subscribe to our channel: 🤍 #Wikipedia #Education
Wikipedia Day is an occasion to celebrate Wikipedia's birthday. On 15 January 2001, two American entrepreneurs-Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger launched an online encyclopedia.It was called Wikipedia. Despite much criticism early on about inaccuracies, it has gone on to be hugely successful. Know so many interesting fact about wikipedia. Wikipedia’s Main Page has always been its most viewed, followed by Special: Search and Special: Random. People says Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. तेरा तुझको अर्पण के लिए यहां क्लिक करें - 🤍 Install The Lallantop Android App: 🤍 Follow us on: 🤍 Like The Lallantop on Facebook: 🤍 Follow The Lallantop on Twitter: 🤍 Follow Futkar on YouTube for Short videos: 🤍 Follow Latak on Instagram: 🤍 For advertisements e-mail us at: Ads🤍thelallantop.com Produced By: The Lallantop Edited By: Varun
Wikipedia now boasts more than 5.7 million articles in English and millions more translated into other languages, all written by online volunteers. Errol Barnett talks to one editor who was named among Time Magazine’s most influential people on the internet. Watch "CBS This Morning" HERE: 🤍 Download the CBS News app on iOS HERE: 🤍 Download the CBS News app on Android HERE: 🤍 Like "CBS This Morning" on Facebook HERE: 🤍 Follow "CBS This Morning" on Twitter HERE: 🤍 Follow "CBS This Morning" on Instagram HERE: 🤍 Get new episodes of shows you love across devices the next day, stream local news live, and watch full seasons of CBS fan favorites anytime, anywhere with CBS All Access. Try it free! 🤍 Delivered by Norah O’Donnell, Gayle King, John Dickerson, and Bianna Golodryga, "CBS This Morning" offers a thoughtful, substantive and insightful source of news and information to a daily audience of 3 million viewers. The Emmy Award-winning broadcast presents a mix of daily news, coverage of developing stories of national and global significance, and interviews with leading figures in politics, business and entertainment. Check local listings for "CBS This Morning" broadcast times.
How reliable is Wikipedia for History?
This video is about Wikipedia Editors Patreon: patreon.com/ghostgum Twitter: twitter.com/notghostgum Shoutout to Squiff for the Art: 🤍 Outro Song: I'm just chillin - Seggito #wikipedia #mods
wikipedia ki secret trick wikipedia trick wikipedia par aese hatayen faltu ki chinje wikipedia par aese kare padai wikipedia ka istemal kaise karen how to use wikipedia how to remove unnecessary content on wikipedia content remove on wikipedia wikipedia trick wikipedia facts facts about wikipedia how to use wikipedia trick #shorts #wikipedia #freeTech
WATCH ME LIVE ► 🤍 stanz ►🤍 atrioc ►🤍 follow me on twitter ►🤍 follow me on instagram ► 🤍 edited by: 🤍 #ludwig #speedrun #wikipedia
Freddie Sayers meets Larry Sanger. Listen to the podcast version: 🤍 Read the full article here: 🤍 Chances are, if you’ve ever been on the internet, you’ve visited Wikipedia. It is the world’s fifth largest website, pulling in an estimated 6.1 billion followers per month and serves as a cheat sheet for almost any topic in the world. So great is the online encyclopaedia’s influence is so great that it is the biggest and “most read reference work in history”, with as many as 56 million editions. But the truth about this supposedly neutral purveyor of information is a little more complex. Historically, Wikipedia has been written and monitored by a community of volunteers who collaborated and contested competing claims with one another. In the words of Wikipedia’s co-founder, Larry Sanger who spoke to Freddie Sayers on LockdownTV, these volunteers would “battle it out”. This battle of ideas on Wikipedia’s platform formed a crucial part of the encyclopaedia’s commitment to neutrality, which according to Sanger, was abandoned after 2009. In the years since, on issues ranging from Covid to Joe Biden, it has become increasingly partisan, primarily espousing an establishment viewpoint that increasingly represents "propaganda". This, says Sanger, is why he left the site in 2007, describing it as “broken beyond repair”. Follow UnHerd on social media: Twitter: 🤍 Facebook: 🤍 #wikipedia #covid19 #bias
This question is asked so many times by my students I thought I'd share with you an analogy I often use, hope it helps!
To learn more about Wikipedia Zero, please visit: 🤍 Also view on Wikimedia Commons: 🤍 Together, we are creating the most comprehensive encyclopedia that has ever existed - Wikipedia. It’s also free; free to read, free to edit, free to share. It is available in hundreds of languages, and it’s accessible to anyone with access to the internet or a mobile phone. Roughly 6 out of every 7 people today have mobile access. Mobile technology is the future of knowledge sharing, it has the potential to bring Wikipedia to billions of people. However, despite Wikipedia’s free content, most people simply can’t afford the data charges to access Wikipedia. That’s why the non-profit that supports Wikipedia runs a program called Wikipedia Zero, which works with mobile carriers to waive the data charges for accessing Wikipedia. Removing the cost of accessing Wikipedia may sound trivial, but it’s one small change that makes a huge difference. Students will do their homework and research careers. Doctors will study treatments. Small businesses will find knowledge to innovate. People will better understand their own history, society, and culture. We invite mobile operators all over the world to make knowledge truly free. Wikipedia belongs to all of us. Imagine a world in which every single human being on the planet has equal access to the sum of all knowledge.
This explainer video shows the different user roles within Wikipedia and answers the question if your edit will be published immediately.
Cursed Moments! #vaazkl My Main Channel :🤍 discord : 🤍 twitter : 🤍
Recorded on 12/19/2022 Doug is a sentient bell pepper who was hired by the FBI to crack gaming challenges and also talk about things with food Watch DougDoug live at 🤍 More Dug: 🤍 Sub a Dug: 🤍 Twitter! 🤍 Watch More DougDoug: Latest Uploads: 🤍 Explained with Food: 🤍 DougDoug Challenges: 🤍 Popular Videos: 🤍
today i looked at unhinged wikipedia articles that are real, these wikipedia articles are actually real, can you believe these unhinged wikipedia articles are actually real? they feel like something only a person who could write a youtube description this one could. How many of yall read this? ive left increasingly indecipherable and borderline cognitohazard material in this section and it rarely gets mentioned. The few who have been made aware of what exists beneath the show more fold are a privileged yet cursed people. wiki articles are unhinged u can stream my song "cracker!" everywhere: 🤍 edited by: nina: 🤍 nuka: 🤍 MASKED UP CLOTHING: 🤍 Discord: 🤍 Instagram: 🤍 Twitter: 🤍 Tik Tok: 🤍 2nd Channel: 🤍 Twitch: 🤍 Subscribe: 🤍
Wike is a Wikipedia reader that is designed for the GNOME desktop but it works great on all desktops. Wike provides access to all the content of this online encyclopedia in a native application, with a simpler and distraction-free view of articles. REFERENCED: ► 🤍 WANT TO SUPPORT THE CHANNEL? 💰 Patreon: 🤍 💳 Paypal: 🤍 🛍️ Amazon: 🤍 👕 Teespring: 🤍 DONATE CRYPTO: 💰 Bitcoin: 1Mp6ebz5bNcjNFW7XWHVht36SkiLoxPKoX 🐶 Dogecoin: D5fpRD1JRoBFPDXSBocRTp8W9uKzfwLFAu 📕 LBC: bMfA2c3zmcLxPCpyPcrykLvMhZ7A5mQuhJ DT ON THE WEB: 🕸️ Website: 🤍 📁 GitLab: 🤍 🗨️ Mastodon: 🤍 👫 Reddit: 🤍 📽️ LBRY/Odysee: 🤍 FREE AND OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE THAT I USE: 🌐 Brave Browser - 🤍 📽️ Open Broadcaster Software: 🤍 🎬 Kdenlive: 🤍 🎨 GIMP: 🤍 🎵 Tenacity: 🤍 💻 VirtualBox: 🤍 🗒️ Doom Emacs: 🤍 Your support is very much appreciated. Thanks, guys!
Changing the tone that you write a blog post in can make a bigger difference than you think. A friendly tone can build more trust and keep people around longer. And it's one of the biggest differences I see with amateur vs. pro bloggers. Have a question or idea for a video? Or maybe you want your site or a specific article reviewed. Let me know here: 🤍 Check out Project 24: 🤍 Project 24 is our membership program that teaches you how to work toward replacing your current income with income from websites and YouTube channels in 24 months. Also check out our stupid fast and crazy functional WordPress theme, Acabado. 🤍 Also, our current recommendations for blogging, video, and podcasting gear, software, and other resources can always be found at 🤍 Have you seen us on Instagram yet? Add us to see what we're doing behind the scenes: 🤍 Project 24 is a product of Income School LLC. Results mentioned are not typical. The trademark “Project 24” refers to the goal of some people to create a successful business in 24 months, but is not a promise or guarantee of that success. Many online businesses fail because, like any business, it requires hard work, skill, and dedication. Before making business decisions, consult financial and legal professionals licensed in your jurisdiction.
In this video we will examine Wikipedia. Can it really be trusted? Can you use it as a basis for your personal study? We will read a few passages in English, Italian and Japanese and I will translate them all for you and we will compare the same pages to see if we reach the same conclusions. At the beginning what you see is my personal nerd room, a small room in my home which works as a time machine to my past where I keep all the things which belong to my teenage years. Follow me on my social networks: 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 Music: intro ES_Knights Templar 1 - Johannes Bornlöf outro ES_Knights Templar 2 - Johannes Bornlöf
If you're not careful, you can fall down a deep, dark rabbit hole on Wikipedia, and you might discover something that haunts your nightmares! Check out today's insane new video that reveals the most terrifying Wikipedia pages you should definitely avoid! 🔔 SUBSCRIBE TO THE INFOGRAPHICS SHOW ► 🤍 🔖 MY SOCIAL PAGES TikTok ► 🤍 Discord ► 🤍 Facebook ► 🤍 Twitter ► 🤍 💭 Find more interesting stuff on: 🤍 📝 SOURCES:🤍 All videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise noted.
When Ken Bazaar was diagnosed with prostate cancer, he turned to Wikipedia for information on his diagnosis. He found links and information that brought him up-to-date on the disease and what he was facing, and it ultimately helped him to decide which treatment was right for him. Doctors see many patients like Ken who are turning to Wikipedia for knowledge. "Is Wikipedia a good source of information?" Dr. Adam Dicker of Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, is a part of the international team of researchers that is trying to answer that very question. They are currently comparing Wikipedia to the National Cancer Institute's Physician Data Query website. And, they've determined that Wikipedia is surprisingly accurate. Because Wikipedia is open to editing and changes by the public, they were surprised to find that there is little amount of inaccuracy and bias in the information found. Although, they do say that Wikipedia is harder to navigate than the Physician Data Query. For more resources, please visit 🤍
Dr Larry Sanger is the ex-founder of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is almost a public utility now, like water or energy. It's one of the most visited sites on the internet and provides millions with information every day. But all might not be as pure as it seems and the utopia of the world's biggest encyclopaedia may have some fundamental flaws. Today we hear from one of the initial members of the project as he explains why Wikipedia is so messed up. Extra Stuff: Follow Dr Sanger on Twitter - 🤍 Check out Dr Sanger's Website - 🤍 Check out The Knowledge Standards Foundation 🤍 Check out everything I recommend from books to products and help support the podcast at no extra cost to you by shopping through this link - 🤍 #wikipedia #freespeech - Listen to all episodes online. Search "Modern Wisdom" on any Podcast App or click here: iTunes: 🤍 Spotify: 🤍 Stitcher: 🤍 - Get in touch in the comments below or head to... Instagram: 🤍 Twitter: 🤍 Email: modernwisdompodcast🤍gmail.com
Want to know how to get the best out of Wikipedia? The Teacher-Helper breaks down what makes Wikipedia ineffective as an academic research tool, and explains the two beneficial uses of Wikipedia. Ashley Marshall is an innovative classroom teacher with over 10 years of instructional experience. He has taught English, History, Geography and ESL from grades 7-12, to both young and adult students. He is also a regular digital lesson contributor to the Learning Bird Education Network. His lively and engaging teaching style makes his lessons memorable, and his classroom an exciting environment for all students. The Teacher-Helper channel offers support to teachers, parents and educators on a variety of education-related topics. Subscribe to this space for a first-look at more innovative video lessons. Leave a comment with suggestions of other topics for the Teacher-Helper to cover. Like him on Facebook at 🤍 Music usage rights secured through Audio Jungle. All pictures are royalty-free images images from Pixabay.com, unless otherwise credited.
It's hard to put an exact figure on the value of wikipedia. Researchers have tried different ways to figure it out but the numbers are all over the place. If we compare its monthly visitors to those of sites like Facebook, Twitter, or LinkedIn we get a ballpark valuation in the $30 billion. But if we put it under the lens as a medical research tool, the estimates are over $1 trillion. So, which is it? As an avid user myself, having the accumulation of knowledge a click away is so unique to our human experience that I can't really put a financial estimate on it - which is what makes Wikipedia so beautiful - it has never been and will never be quantifiable in dollars and cents. But if I had to, I think Wikipedia surpasses the value of Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn combined so the trillion dollar estimate sounds right to me. Read the full article: 🤍 Subscribe to The Daily Conversation 🤍 Join the conversation on Facebook 🤍 Add TDC to your circles on Google+ 🤍 Follow The Daily Conversation on Twitter 🤍 , Wikipedia,Worth,Money,Value,Wikipedia worth,billions,trillions,Jimmy Wales,trillion,library,research,website,google,facebook,linked in,linkedin,microsoft,education,college,university,best,twitter,internet,invention,invent,change the world,good,inspiring,vlog,TDC,TheDailyConversation,market,invest,nonprofit,activism,editor,video,Brendan,important,analysis,paper,school,best university,learn,learning,resource,US,Company,great,fun,interesting,news,politics,technology,computer,tablet